|

Fixation of pay on promotion to a post carrying grade pay

Fixationย of pay on promotion to a post carrying higherย duties and responsibilitiesย but carrying the same grade pay

CIRCULAR
Office of the Principal Controller of Accounts (Fys)
10-A, S.K. BOSE ROAD, KOLKATA-700001

No. Pay/Tech-1/01 (6th CPC) /2014/01

Date: 30-01-2014

To
All Group Controllers

Subject:ย Fixationย of pay on promotion to a post carrying higherย duties and responsibilitiesย but carrying the same grade pay.

References hove been received from different Br. AOs andย Factoriesย regarding extension of benefit of 3% increment inย terms ofย MoF, Deportment of Expenditureย OM No. 10/02/2011-E.III/A dtd 07.01.2013 [click here to view]ย to those employees who were promoted f rom CM-II to CM-l/AF to JWM/MCM to CM on or ofter 1.1.2006.
In this connection, it may be stated that as per MoF, Deptt of Expenditureย OM No. 10/02/2011-E.III/A dtd 07.01.2013, benefit ofย fixationย of pay under FR 22(1) (a) (l) can be extended when both the feeder and promotional grades were placed in the identical revisedย pay scalesย based on the recommendation of the 6th CPC and where the existence of both the erstwhile posts are continued in 6 CPC and at the same time the promotional post also involves assumption of higher responsibilities as envisaged in the MoF OM No. 169/2/2000-lC dtd 24.11.2000.
In this context, it is also significant to mention that after 6th CPC, the posts of CM-II & I and AF & JWM have been merged and replaced by a single grade of CM or JWM with a grade pays of Rs. 4200/- and Rs. 4600/- respectively. ย Therefore, promotion between these grades after 6th CPC remains no more available and noย movementย within merged grade is practically possible and the basic conditions stipulated in G of I, MoF OM dtd 24-11-2000 including assumption of higher charge and existence of feeder and promotion grade are not fulfilled. Thus the benefit of 3% increment forย movementย from CM-II to CM-I and AF to JWM is not admissible inย terms ofย proviso to para 2 of the aforesaid OM dtd 7.1.2013.
Whereas, in case ofย movementย from MCM to CM, it may be stated that prior to 1.1.2006, the MCM grade was not a hierarchical post. The MCMs were part of HS cadre during 5th CPC. After theย restructuringย of Artisan cadre w.e.f ย 1.1.2006, the MCM grade has become a separate hierarchical post and cannot be treated within the strength of the HS. Hence, the condition stipulated under proviso to para 3 of MoF OM dtd 7-1-2013, that the promotional movementย should be between two different posts of feeder and promotion post prior to 1 /1/2006 now carrying some grade pay, is not fulfilled in the case of the MCM also w.e.f 01-0.l -2006.
As such, promotionol benefit inย terms ofย MOF OM dtd 7.1.2013 to the CM-l & JWM on their promotion from CM-II/MCM & AF respectively on or after .l.1.2006 may not be considered for admittance.

Br. AOs under your control may please be intimated accordingly.
Addl. C of A (Fys) has approved.

Asst. Controller of Accounts (Fys)

Download PCA circular No. Pay/Tech-1/01 (6th CPC) /2014/01 dated 30.01.2014

GConnect on Google News

You might also like:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *